Type of evidence:
Peer-reviewed conference contribution (scientific committee) — ADSA–CSAS–ASAS Joint Annual Meeting
Institution involved:
Università di Perugia (as reported in the contribution)
Sector:
Finishing pigs — manure management / environmental hygiene
Experimental design:
Field monitoring with treated vs. control comparison; monthly slurry sampling
Main outcomes:
Aerobic Total Bacterial Count; Enterobacteriaceae; Micrococcaceae; Streptococcaceae
Main results:
−73.1% Aerobic Total Bacterial Count (treated vs. control)−62.9% Micrococcaceae (treated vs. control)−66.9% Streptococcaceae (treated vs. control)−67.6% Enterobacteriaceae (treated vs. control)Context note:
Longitudinal monitoring with repeated sampling is particularly informative for evaluating operational strategies under real farm conditions.
Methodological and compliance note
The reported results derive from a peer-reviewed conference contribution and describe field monitoring evidence in a commercial farm. The evidence should be interpreted in the context of the study design and the operational conditions reported in the contribution. The cited SOP products are not veterinary medicinal products and are not intended for the treatment, prevention, or cure of diseases. Health-related decisions remain the responsibility of the attending veterinarian, in compliance with regulations and good farming practices.